I have heard it said that the COG struggles with the ghost of AJT. One of the struggles seems to be the dependent relationship with centralized power when it comes to choosing leadership. The Church of God may have moved from the tyranny of AJT and one man rule (if you believe the assemblies played no role in the development of the COG in that era), but now it seems the psyche of the church can not move past the power of a few and the entrenched denominational structure and identity. The COG has committed so much to what it is now and takes so much comfort (pride?) in what they have accomplished, it seems not only hard to envision a different system that can identify and place new leadership, but there is a fear of moving away from the corporate identity. So few are willing to step up and say there needs to be reform, just in case one day they may have the opportunity to move up the ladder in the system.Maybe its the ghost of AJT or is it the specter of entreated denominational identity? That's something to think about when you are sitting in the Assembly in Nashville voting to fill the positions and revise the Minutes (again). Why do all these discussions lead nowhere when it comes to changing the system?