Is the textual evidence to the missing ending to Mark evidence of Mark being the earliest Gospel?

Is the textual evidence to the missing ending to Mark evidence of Mark being the earliest Gospel?

Mark 16:8 seems much too abrupt for an ending to the Gospel of Mark. The textual evidence indicates that none of the four endings we now have after Mark 16:8 are original, in other words the original ending was lost. The ending may have …

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *