Hubris and Replacement Theology :: By The Gospelist

Replacement Theology is the false doctrine that God has rejected the nation of Israel and replaced it with the church forever.

God has no plans for the nation of Israel, according to their man-made theology, and everything the prophets prophesied about Israel has either already taken place or applies to the church.

Replacement theologians ask themselves, “Did God reject his people?” and reply, “By every means!”

Replacement theologians have spurned Paul’s admonition not to be arrogant toward the “natural branches” (Romans 11:21). They are not the least bit concerned that if God did not spare the natural branches, Israel, that he will not spare them either.

The Apostle Paul warns these people that if they refuse to continue in God’s kindness, they may find themselves cut off (11:22).  That is what happens to those who monkey around and twist God’s Word.

The fact that the Jews have returned to the promised land after almost 1,900 years is not a coincidence; it is a miracle of God.  Replacement theologians dismiss this miracle and continue to insist that the bones of the house of Israel are dried up and their hope is gone.

They don’t take the prophet Ezekiel any more seriously than they take Paul.

The apostle Paul warned of this kind of arrogance and cautioned that such theologians should consider the kindness and sternness of God.  To dogmatically stick to a theory that is built on speculation rather than the plain reading of God’s Word is foolish.

There is an interesting phenomenon that is occurring with ‘Replacement theologians’ who, inevitably, become anti-Israel.  Many political commentators, who were once conservative, who publicly denounce Israel, are not that long after rendered ineffective as social commentators.

Also, those nations whose people embrace anti-Israel theology become infested with leaders who seem determined to enforce sharia on their people.

Candace Owens was once a powerful young voice for conservatism, and we were all excited that she was on our side.  There seemed to be a growing number of young intellectuals who were eager to go to war with the murderous left.

Then something went terribly wrong.

First, Candace was fired from the Daily Wire because she began talking as if the people of Israel were the bad guys and the ‘Palestinians’ were the good guys.  This was unconscionable to Ben Shapiro, a powerful figure at the Wire, and she was sent packing not long after.

Candace then allegedly decided to counsel Ben on the idea that he cannot serve two masters, God and money.  The accusation seemed to include the idea that Ben was on the Israeli payroll.  This was a personal attack on him, which looked a lot like bearing false witness against her neighbor, because it was only meant to damage his reputation rather than advance a productive idea.

She then allegedly began spreading “blood libel” conspiracy theories against the Jewish State by accusing Jews of ritual child sacrifice.  Not sure where that came from.

She allegedly moved on to accusing Israel of assassinating JFK.  This assassination had everything to do with getting the U.S. into Vietnam.  It was probably perpetrated by our own countrymen.  Israel had just been founded fifteen years earlier and probably did not have the resources to knock off the most powerful man in the world for no good reason.

They were too busy preparing for another Muslim invasion.

She then allegedly called Israel a “cult nation” and implied that the Star of David was a “hexog.”  The nation of Israel was not loved by God, she seemed to opine – it had joined the occult and embraced mysticism.

That was a bold accusation coming from a Roman Catholic.

She moved on to featuring guests and providing credibility to various controversial people on her show who were also anti-Israel.  She even allegedly gave a platform to a holocaust denier.

Finally, after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, she seemed to claim that she was still close to the family until that was exposed as false.  Her invitation to the funeral never materialized.

She also seemed to believe that Benjamin Netanyahu and the nation of Israel may have been involved in Charlie’s death.  She has amended this false accusation and seems to be insinuating that Trump had Kirk assassinated, too.

These assertions show that she has become more interested in clickbait than the truth.

Candace Owens, once a strong advocate for conservatism, flickered out and now has lost all credibility.

This is not the time for our side to begin losing allies; the stakes are much too high.

In my opinion, her loss of credibility was precipitated by her decision to attack the nation of Israel.  This failing was not caused by people paid off by Israel to harm her career; she was likely cursed by God. God was very clear: “I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you.”

Interestingly, the left no longer seems concerned about Candace.  That is always a telltale sign that you have gone off the rails.

Then there is Tucker Carlson.

He has followed the same path as Candace Owens.  He was once a powerful enemy of the left.  Now the left seems to have little interest in him.  It’s funny how, once a person becomes anti-Israel, the left seems to sense a kindred spirit.

I base that assessment on the fact that, as a subscriber to his YouTube channel, his content is seldom worth listening to.  When he was on Fox, much of his content was excellent.

Tucker has engaged in the following errors:

• Tucker has falsely accused many conservative U.S. leaders of prioritizing Israel’s interests over America’s when this is not true.
• He believes that Israel exerts too much control over U.S. foreign policy for nefarious reasons rather than the fact that this nation is supporting an excellent ally.
• He sees Netanyahu, who is defending his nation against a demonic world that demands its destruction, as a war monger who is drawing America into wars that are not in our interest. God will bless any nation that blesses Israel, and that blessing is very much in our interest.
• He seems to justify the ‘Palestinian’ attack on October 7 and sees Israel as the real oppressors. He has adopted the propaganda of Hamas, which is a complete inversion of the truth.
• He hosts interviews with people like pro-Palestinian ‘Christian pastor’ Munther Isaac, who could not preach the Gospel if his life depended on it.
• He seems to blame Israel for the crucifixion of Christ when we are all responsible. Did the prophets proclaim that Jesus was supposed to live a long life, get married, have kids, and die at a ripe old age?

Tucker is a member of the Episcopal Church, which is spiritually dead and probably will not recover.  He was likely never taught sound doctrine, so it is understandable that he does not comprehend the mission of Christ.

But what force would cause him to blame the Jews exclusively for Christ’s death?

Tucker is also losing credibility, at least with thinking people, and will eventually succumb to the curse that God has no doubt put on him.

Then there is Alex Jones.  He has a vacillating relationship with the nation of Israel but has allegedly promoted conspiracy theories against Israel, Jews, and Zionists.

After falsely insinuating that the Sandy Hook massacre was a false flag event, a fraudulent lawsuit that should have been thrown out immediately was brought against him, and he was sued for 1.4 billion dollars.

He was financially destroyed by an outrageously unconstitutional civil suit.

Jones lost everything in this farcical civil suit, even though it was a severe violation of freedom of speech.  It seems impossible, given the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, that anyone could be sued for outrageous sums of money for making a reckless comment.  There were no victims or financial losses as a result of his speech, probably not even hurt feelings.

Be that as it may, it was upheld by a corrupt judiciary that was blinded to the understanding of what freedom of speech really means.

And SCOTUS demonstrated supernatural stupidity by not reversing this idiocy.  This ruling was a terrible blow to freedom of speech.  All of our courts suspiciously lost the ability to reason in this case.

Sure looks like a curse to me.

There seems to be a process developing for those ‘conservatives’ who were once fighting against the demonic left but have become anti-Israel.  The process looks like this:

1. You lose your job for whatever reason, but you want to be relevant.
2. You bear false witness against the nation of Israel and its government, which gets you a lot of attention. Your vitriol is seldom directed at Islam, which is evil and oppressive, and is turned against the Jews as if they are the biggest problem in the world.
3. The left stops attacking you, at least not as viciously, which provides some relief.
4. You begin making increasingly absurd claims until you lose credibility.
5. You are rendered ineffective as you slowly lose the ability to reason.

The people of France and England have demanded a ‘Palestinian’ State because they are extremely anti-Israel.  They are now overrun with Muslims who have begun to subjugate them.  These third-world savages, who now have more rights than the actual citizens of the countries they have infiltrated, attack their women with impunity and have made their cities dirtier and more dangerous.

Looks to me like God will bless those who bless Israel and will curse those who curse Israel.

The world, which is run by Satan, has lined up his pawns to destroy the nation of Israel.  He has enlisted the aid of the evil Globalists, the Marxists, and the Muslims.

And they are demonically inspired to destroy the nation of Israel.

Anyone who joins with Satan in this effort will be cursed by God.  If you are taking the Lord’s name in vain by preaching false doctrine and bearing false witness against the nation of Israel and the Jews, plan on being cursed by God.

It looks like our understanding of Genesis 12:2-3, that the blessings and curses also apply to Abraham’s progeny, is holding up pretty well.

One must be spiritually blind not to see the importance of the nation of Israel in the Book of Revelation.  After chapter three, which deals with the church, the rest of the book clearly deals with the world and its relation to the nation of Israel.

For instance,

• Revelation 7: The 144,000 will be from the twelve Tribes of Israel, not the church.
• Revelation 11:1-4: The two witnesses stand outside of the rebuilt temple and prophesy; their witness has nothing to do with the church.
• Revelation 12: The red dragon, when he is thrown to the earth, goes after the nation of Israel, not the church.
• The Angel Michael is the prince and protector of Israel (Daniel 12:1 and Revelation 12:7-12); he is not the defender of the church.
• Revelation 13:9: It is stated several times in the first three chapters that, “Whoever has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.” The Spirit is no longer talking to the churches (He who has an ear) at this point, but to Israel and the world, because the church has been removed.
• Revelation 16:16: The battle of Armageddon is a war to destroy the nation of Israel, not the church. The valley of Megiddo is another name for the Jezreel Valley, which is in northern Israel, where the nations of the world gather to destroy Israel.
• The Book of Revelation completes the seventy ‘sevens’ that God has decreed for the people of Israel and Jerusalem (Daniel 9:24). Its conclusion will put an end to sin, atone for wickedness, bring in everlasting righteousness, seal up vision and prophecy, and anoint God’s holy temple.

There are those among the Christian elite who wish to allegorize Scripture, especially the Book of Revelation.  A literal reading of God’s Word would render their theology useless, which is why they reject sound doctrine where Israel is concerned.

More concerning is that those who allegorize Scripture have placed themselves in terrible peril.  There is a stern warning in the Book of Revelation, a book which ‘Replacement Theologians’ would love to turn into a fable, for anyone who attempts to allegorize Scripture that was meant to be taken literally.

“I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, ¹⁹ and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book” (Revelation 22:18-19).

It looks to me like those who reject the nation of Israel, by allegorizing Scripture, have placed themselves under a curse.  There is no question that ‘Replacement Theology’ takes away from the words of the Book of Revelation.

The adherents to this doctrine are also starting to look a lot like the ‘mockers’ that will show up prior to the return of Christ.

These people suspiciously possess an underlying hatred for the nation of Israel but are silent in the face of relentless Hamas atrocities.  They are getting awfully cozy with Satan and his minions.

The nation of Israel is the only country in the Middle East that has a civilized government that poses no threat to the U.S.  The only way to explain the irrational hatred of Israel by misguided theologians is just good old-fashioned pride.

Hubris is a form of arrogance that leads to one’s destruction.

Replacement theologians are filthy with it.

www.gospelist.net

 

The post Hubris and Replacement Theology :: By The Gospelist appeared first on Rapture Ready.