Editors Note (5)

Editors Note (5)

Editor’s Note

second installment on

Charismatic picture

of

planned

1

what was

going

on in the

a

thought-provoking

in some

geographical

the

In this issue’s FOCUS

section,

Dr. Peter Hocken is

providing

his

the Charismatic Renewal. In the first issue devoted to this

topic (Volume 16,

Fall

1994),

Dr. Hocken

gathered

a series of articles aimed at

describing

movement. These articles

painted

a movement that was

flourishing

regions

and sectors of the Christian

community

and

largely

on demise in other

regions

and communions.

Originally

Peter and I had

for a FEEDBACK section in this current issue which would critically

interact with the articles from the first installment.

However,

our

control,

materialize. It has been a

personal pleasure

to work with him

again

on this issue. I will

greatly

miss

working

with him next

year

when he retires as the Executive

Secretary

of the

Society

and returns to his

due to circumstances

beyond

homeland in England.

currently

involved. with other traditions intramural discussions movement-another Pentecostal-Reformed

focused on “Pentecostals

Pentecostalism and retired,

Professor readership

that intention did not

17,

Fall

1995) provided

an in which Pentecostals are

and two

involving

section

Dean

among

the scholars of Renewal.

Although officially

in active

scholarship.

The

Last issue’s FOCUS section

(Volume

update

on the various formal

dialogues

To those

dialogues-two involving

Pentecostals

in the Christian

community

within the Pentecostal-Charismatic

in its

infancy

would now need to be added: The

Dialogue.

The FEEDBACK in this issue provides

an

appraisal

of the articles from the

previous

issue which

in

Dialogue.”

The

dialogical partner

is Dr. Walter J.

Hollenweger, acknowledged

the Charismatic

Hollenweger

continues

of PNEUMA will find his feedback marked

by the prophetic criticism that is vintage Hollenweger.

One of the

dialogues analyzed

in the

previous

issue was the Racial

Dialogue

of October

Dr. Frank Macchia wrote the

description

of the

Memphis colloquium

in the

previous FOCUS section of PNEUMA. Dr. Macchia then used his own PNEUMA

article,

as well as the first-hand

experience

of

many

of the

of the

Memphis gathering,

to

arrange

for a roundtable

Reconciliation

Dialogue

at the 25th Annual

of the

Society

for Pentecostal Studies in

Toronto, Canada, March

7-9, 1996.

The articles included in the ROUNDTABLE

Reconciliation “Memphis

Miracle.” provided

his

analysis

participants

discussion on the Racial Meeting

in this issue are

printed

from

17-19, 1994,

the so-called

and

that SPS

section discussion on racial

reconciliation. Aside from some modifications made in Dr. Macchia’s opening statement,

to

change

it into an

appropriate

introduction to the statements which

follow,

the individual

pieces

of the roundtable

1

2

permission

again

timeliness, Cerillo

willingness appreciated. require commitment, remain relatively

Even

acquiring

One of the

contribution,

book reviews

discussion are

preserved

for the historical record in the

way they

were written.

Only

a

light

editorial hand was used to conform the

pieces

to the

organizational

format and

stylistic policies

of PNEUMA. A

special word of

appreciation

is owed to Dr. Macchia for

obtaining

the

from all the

participants

for the

publication

of their roundtable

opening

statements in PNEUMA.

The BOOK REVIEWS section

completes

this issue. Please note

the

request

for individuals to

complete

and mail in a photocopy of the “Book Reviewers Wanted” form in the back of the

journal.

All of us associated with the

academy

know that

writing

book reviews is a time

consuming

labor with little

professional pay-off

Yet we also know that book reviews written

by specialists

in the field

provide

us with an invaluable

scholarly

service from

professional colleagues.

marks of a

quality

academic

journal

is the

depth, breadth, sturdiness,

and

helpfulness

of its book review section. Dr.

Augustus

and I are thankful for those who have volunteered their services since the last issue. We still need to

develop

in this

area,

and

your

to

register your

interest in

writing

a review is

gratefully

As with

any professional

a

timely response.

with that kind of

professional

a sufficient

supply

of book reviews will

always

an

on-going challenge

for a

specialized

academic

journal

with a

limited number of subscribers. Dr. Cerillo is to be commended for

making

the book review section an

indispensable part of each issue of the journal.

With this

Spring

1996 issue of volume

18,

we welcome Dr.

Jerry

the editorial staff of the

journal.

He will be

serving the

society

and its journal as the

Managing

Editor of PNELIMA. Dr.

is a New Testament scholar who

by academic training is accustomed to

paying

close attention to detail in

performing

his exegetical

work. That dedication to detail is one of the

gifts

which Dr. Camery-Hoggatt brings

to his

management

office,

a

gift

that is

especially germane

referees to

improve

the evaluation

aspect

of articles submitted to the

In

addition,

his

scholarly specialization

will be utilized in

initial assessment of the

manuscripts

we receive in the biblical

Camery-Hoggatt

to

Camery-Hoggatt

journal. providing studies area.

of PNEUMA ‘s editorial in

light

of the addition of

We on the editorial staff of PNELIMA

hope you

find this issue of the journal academically

informative and

intellectually stimulating.

Murray

W.

Dempster

2


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *