Cult of the Coming Beast Part 4 :: By Joe Hawkins

Cult of the Coming Beast Part 4 :: By Joe Hawkins

Compromise, Ecumenism, and Laodicean Drift

Bible prophecy not only forewarns of deception in the world at large, but also of a great apostasy or falling away within the ranks of those who profess Christianity (2 Thessalonians 2:3). As we near the culmination of this age, we see many segments of the global Church being pressured or seduced into compromise – precisely along the lines we’ve been discussing: unity at the expense of truth, and submission to worldly agendas under the banner of peace and justice.

Ecumenism Over Truth

In the name of unity and peace, there is a strong movement toward ecumenism – the merging of different Christian denominations, and even an effort to find common ground with other religions. On the surface, “unity” is a positive biblical concept (Jesus prayed for believers to be one in John 17). But the crucial question is: unity on whose terms, and at what cost?

The ecumenical push in many cases minimizes or sets aside core truths of the Gospel to avoid offense or disagreement. There is a narrative that if all faiths work together (for example, for social causes like climate action or fighting poverty), the world will be better. While cooperation on common good can be fine, the danger is a “One-World Religion” ethos, where distinctive truths are dissolved. The book of Revelation pointedly warns of a future harlot religion – a global spiritual system collaborating with Antichrist (symbolized by the woman who rides the Beast, Revelation 17). This false church is intoxicated with the accolades of the world and persecutes the true saints (Rev 17:6).

Today, we see strange alliances forming: high-profile evangelical leaders cozying up to the papacy, the Vatican hosting interfaith prayer with imams and rabbis, and worldwide religious declarations (like the **“Faith for Earth” initiative) that treat all religions as essentially equal partners. The Pope’s Abrahamic Family House in Abu Dhabi, opened in 2023, establishes a joint campus of a church, mosque, and synagogue – a monument to the idea that we’re all one big faith family. Again, unity sounds nice, but who is being exalted?

The drive is often for “peace” – “peace, peace” where there is no true peace” (Jeremiah 6:14) – rather than for the exclusive truth of salvation through Jesus Christ. Some Protestant churches have removed teachings that might offend (like sin, repentance, the uniqueness of Christ) in order to partner with others. This is exactly the trajectory toward the apostate church of the end times, which has “a form of godliness” but has drifted from the real power of the Gospel (2 Timothy 3:5).

A telling development is that some mainline Protestant denominations now even shy away from using the term “Antichrist” for anything, since it might hinder ecumenical fellowship with groups that historically were seen as erring. In fact, there have been calls to stop identifying the Antichrist with any particular institution (historically, many Protestants saw the Papal office as an antichrist figure).

Compromised Protestants want to remove such language to avoid upsetting the ecumenical applecart. This shows a willingness to set aside prophetic truth for the sake of superficial harmony. Yet the Bible clearly forewarns that a false prophet will lead a one-world religion that “will oppose the Gospel, persecute Christians, and minimize the importance of doctrine.” Knowing this, how can true believers blithely join hands in spiritual alliance with those who reject foundational truths? The only way is deception or apathy regarding truth – both of which are now common.

Digital Submission and Worldly Influence

Another area of compromise is what might be called “digital submission” – the Church’s uncritical embrace of technological trends and the resultant vulnerability to control. During COVID, for instance, many churches obediently closed their doors for extended periods, moving to online services. While temporary precautions may have been prudent, in many places, governments treated churches as non-essential, and some church leaders acquiesced without protest, even as liquor stores or other entities remained open.

This revealed a certain prioritization of state directives over the biblical mandate to gather (Hebrews 10:25). Some churches even enforced vaccine passport rules for attendance, effectively turning away part of their flock to comply with government health edicts. Such actions put state and societal approval above the unity of the body of Christ, arguably a capitulation of the church’s distinct authority under Christ.

Moreover, as churches have become reliant on streaming, social media, and digital platforms, they have also come under the sway of Big Tech censorship and metrics. There is a subtle self-censorship that can occur: pastors may avoid preaching on certain biblical truths (say, about sexual morality or the exclusivity of Christ) for fear of being de-platformed or labeled as hate speech. Or they may water down messages to appeal to online algorithms (wanting to be “liked” and shared widely). The danger is a church that chases cultural relevance and peace at the expense of truth.

Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36), and the apostles warned of friendship with the world being enmity with God (James 4:4). Yet, a worldly spirit has entered many churches, where success is measured in popularity and appeasing the crowd.

This manifests in the content of preaching: some churches have virtually replaced the Gospel of repentance and faith with a social gospel of activism or a therapeutic message of self-improvement. Aligning with popular causes (racial justice, climate care, etc.) isn’t wrong per se, but when those eclipse the central mission of saving souls and teaching all that Christ commanded, the church has lost its saltiness. The Laodicean church in Revelation 3 thought itself rich and in need of nothing, not realizing it was wretched and blind. It was lukewarm, fit to be spit out (Rev 3:16-17).

One interpretation of Laodicea is the end-times church characterized by complacent compromise – perhaps materially comfortable or socially accepted, but spiritually compromised and powerless. Unfortunately, much of the Western Church today fits this bill: anxious to be liked by the world, unwilling to stand against the prevailing narratives, and thus ripe for assimilation into the false religious system that will serve Antichrist.

Even the push for “peace” can be problematic. Scripture says, “For when they say, ‘Peace and safety!’ then sudden destruction comes upon them” (1 Thess. 5:3). The Antichrist is expected to initially rise as a peacemaker (Daniel 9:27 suggests he brokers a covenant). There is a real possibility that a compromised Church, which has already prioritized peace over truth, will hail the Antichrist as a great leader.

Think about it: a world leader arises who promises to solve climate change, end wars, cure diseases, and unite religions – the ultimate social justice champion and miracle worker. Without strong biblical discernment, many religious people (including Christians in name) could be utterly taken in. 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 warns that the lawless one will come “with all unrighteous deception… because they did not receive the love of the truth.” And for this reason, God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie. This is a frightening prospect: those who do not truly love the truth of God’s Word will be given over to a great delusion, believing the Antichrist’s lies as if they were God’s truth.

We already see preludes of this delusion in the Church. How many who occupy pews truly know the Scriptures and hold them as the final authority?

Biblical illiteracy is high. Many follow charismatic personalities or chase the latest spiritual fads. Some churches are more driven by political ideology (whether left or right) than by the Bible. These factors show a vulnerability to deception. If one’s faith is shallow or built on a personality, one could easily transfer loyalty to a charismatic global leader who seems to have divine favor (especially if accompanied by signs and wonders – Rev 13:13-14 describes the False Prophet performing great signs, even making fire come from heaven, to authenticate the Beast).

In contrast, a faithful remnant will resist these trends. They will hold to the testimony of Jesus and the commandments of God (Rev 12:17), even when it’s unpopular or dangerous. Jesus asked, “When the Son of Man comes, will He really find faith on the earth?” (Luke 18:8). That implies true faith will be scarce. But those who do endure, though marginalized or persecuted by the global cult, will be the victors in God’s eyes (Rev 3:21).

It’s imperative that the Church awaken to the reality of these spiritual pressures. We must reject false unity that sacrifices truth, resist the encroachment of technocratic control on our mission, and above all, remain loyal to Jesus Christ above all parties, causes, or earthly leaders. The professing Church that bends with the wind of the world will end up swept into the deception. Only the one anchored to the Rock of ages – standing on Scripture, filled with the Holy Spirit – will discern the lie and stand apart when the masses bow to the Beast.

Part 5 will cover Conditioning for the Antichrist System and wrap up the series with A Call to Vigilance, Discernment, and Gospel Witness.

 

The post Cult of the Coming Beast Part 4 :: By Joe Hawkins appeared first on Rapture Ready.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *